A Girl Reading
Painted in 1845/50 by Camille Corot. Stolen from the Jewish collector Paul Rosenberg in 1941.
A Girl Reading by Camille Corot has a turbulent history. It once belonged to the French-Jewish art dealer Paul Rosenberg, who was an important gallery owner and collector in Paris. His collection of Impressionist paintings was considered one of the most important of its time.1 After the Nazi invasion of Paris, Rosenberg was forced to close his gallery and flee the country. Like countless other works, this painting was confiscated by the «Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg» and handed over personally to Hermann Göring in September 1941. A few months later, in April 1942, the Nazis exchanged it with the Lucerne gallery owner Theodor Fischer for other works that were more in keeping with their taste and ideal of art. Through these coincidences, Emil Bührle finally got his chance, and in the same month he was able to pounce and secure the painting for his own rapidly growing collection.
In June 1948, as part of the so-called «looted property trials» or «Raubgutprozesse», the Swiss Federal Court ruled that Bührle had to return this and other works to their rightful owner Paul Rosenberg. But Bührle must have grown fond of this painting: Four weeks later he bought it back from Rosenberg.
Today, the Bührle Collection boasts in its own audio guide that it is the owner of the «rare figure paintings»2 by Camille Corot. The audio ends on the light-hearted note that this painting is one of several that Bührle «acquired twice». This phrase represents the entire historical contextualisation to which the Kunsthaus is currently prepared. It is a deliberate attempt to gloss over what «acquiring» in this time actually meant: being a beneficiary of the Shoah and a purchaser of stolen property. In this way, Bührle was not only a customer, but also served as an accomplice of the National Socialists.
To this day, however, the Kunsthaus prefers to rely on the sanitised version that Bührle did not know anything about all this. Proof of this seems to be found in Bührle’s testimony in court at the time. Even in 1942, when the arms supplier bought the work from the Lucerne gallery owner Theodor Fischer, he was allegedly unaware of the expropriation of Jewish property by the Nazis.
«I didn’t have any specific reasons to ask questions back then. However, I was surprised that now, all of a sudden, Fischer had a selection in rare abundance to show. Fischer is a very well-known dealer, and I simply assumed that he had managed to track down a favourable acquisition opportunity, [...]. The expropriation of Jewish art property by Germans in occupied countries had not yet become known at all. I personally was not aware of a single case of this kind in Germany. I heard that some enterprises had been ‹aryanised/arisiert›, but never that paintings had been taken away.»3